According to the Blizzard Q&A session regarding the SC2 (on Gamespot): Lehesu, though I've heard the rumours about a forth race, you are correct about the races. Asking for a phenomenal repeat of SC's success might be asking too much, but Blizzard does have a knack for doing so.Įxcellent point about the resources Lehesu. Even if SC2 doesn't bring any major revolutionary gameplay to the table, as long as it has the strong genes of its predecessor, I think it will be a pretty good game. I only ever played with friends and all of us were turtling experts, so rushing was a non-issue for us. I remember feeling the outrage regarding Kerrigan near the end of the Terran campaign and I'm still a little broken up about Tassadar. Fourth, if you were into single player games, it had a great storyline. In this, SC shared the same feature that still endears many of us to STW. Third was the rock-paper-scissors nature of the units. When I played online, I never had issue with playing any of the races. First, as Ironside mentioned, was the unique races. There are a few factors that made SC such a great game. I'm very pleased to hear about this BTW, they might even do something with the Umojan who certainly looks like a cut thread (although it wouldn't surprice me if Reynor got sopme connections there). When you hear the thud of Gregoshi fainting you'll know that he red this :beam: To prove it, I'll ask Gregoshi to not use static defences in the campaign :laugh4. No rushing in SP, but acuiring new resources is vital though.īasically the economical stuff is to find a good optimum of workers (2/crystal tops iirc, 3 for the gas plant on shortest distance), protect them, acuire new resources and churn out the correct mixture of troops (depends on what you plans and what the opponent got).Įarly rushing is there though, mostly to counter teching.įYI the static defences are much, much stronger in SC than in WCIII. It still holds it own today though, and worth buying if you haven't tried it out yet. What made Starcraft truely brilliant at it's time was that it had 3 very different races, that they were balanced, that all units never became obsolete and one of the better stories to wrap it in. Games doesn't usually age well with time, their ideas will get stolen and improved. But it's ancient by todays standards and has been surpassed by the likes of DoW (incidentally, i believe StarCraft was originally intended to be a warhammer 40K game). StarCraft was one of the first games to emphasize 'tactical' gameplay to some degree. With WiC and new CoH expansion coming out later this year.this game will struggle, if it wasn't called SC2, and for arguments sake called Warhammer 40k: But Without The Licence (WH40K: TWTL.rolls off ya tongue) I doubt anyone would be second glancing at information about it. The game looks like its for existing SC fans, from what I've seen its not going to win any new fans, heck even AoE 3 Far East Xpack looks better. This SC2 doesn't bring anything new to the table, heck I don't even think it has destructable environments that makes CoH and the upcoming World In Conflict (which also doesn't have resources as we know and loathe them) so visually brilliant. This is the reason I like CoH, with the machine guns at bases from the start rushing is impossible and the resource system in CoH is brilliant.
However in the Q&A session on gamespot Blizzard are actually boasting about (as opposed to WC3) a return to more emphasis on resource management and rushing.the two things I hate in RTS. I feel the best RTS on the market is Company of Heroes, RTS should be about tactics, positioning, flanking etc. So as soon as I saw SC2 was announced on GameSpot I set about absorbing as much information as possible.I couldn't care less now.
#SHORTEST STARCRAFT 2 GAME PC#
Well after only coming to pc gaming in the past couple of years I've heard so much about this legendary game, Starcraft.
0 kommentar(er)
